KanexPro Support Assistant

Describe your setup, the part number, and what you are seeing.

Before we start

So the team can follow up if this needs a person.

Used only to follow up on this request. See our Privacy Policy.

General enquiry

Tell us what you need and the right person will come back to you.

Used only to answer you. See our Privacy Policy.

Support › Knowledge base › AV Over IP

White Paper: AV over IP vs. Traditional Matrix — Part 2: Distance, Control, Expansion & Decision Guide

White Paper — Part 2 of 2

AV over IP vs. Traditional Matrix Switching

Distance, Control Integration, Expansion & Decision Guide

Continued from Part 1: architecture, scalability, latency, image quality, and network requirements.

6. Distance & Cabling

Traditional MatrixAV over IP
Max direct HDMI5m passive / 15m activeN/A
Max copper100m via HDBaseT extender100m per segment (CAT6)
Long-haulFiber extender (vendor-specific)Standard SFP fiber (kilometers)

Verdict: AV over IP wins for large facilities. Traditional matrix is appropriate where source and display are co-located.

7. Control Integration

Both architectures fully support RS-232, TCP/IP, Crestron, AMX, Savant, and Control4. KanexPro AV over IP controllers add a web GUI and a TCP/IP command interface over SSH (Telnet as well on the AVO-IPCTL-JP2K, AVO-IPCTL-265HD and AVO-IPCTL-SDV) alongside RS-232, so routing can be driven from a control processor or from custom software.

8. Expansion and Lifecycle

A traditional matrix is sized by its chassis: once every output is in use, adding a display means a larger frame. AV over IP expands one endpoint at a time, with another decoder on another switch port. Additional lifecycle advantages: per-endpoint firmware updates without system downtime, and mixed-generation deployments where individual endpoints are replaced independently.

9. Decision Framework

ScenarioRecommended
Small room, 2–4 endpoints, no growth expectedTraditional matrix
Medium facility, 8–16 endpoints, possible expansionAV over IP (JPEG2000) or Modular Matrix
Large venue, 20+ displays, campus or multi-floorAV over IP (JPEG2000 or H.265)
Zero-latency (broadcast, live production)Traditional matrix or SDVoE
Digital signage, 50+ displays, low-motion contentAV over IP (H.265)
Video wall or command centerAV over IP (JPEG2000) or FLEX Modular Matrix
Existing CAT6, IT-managed networkAV over IP
No dedicated IT, non-technical end userTraditional matrix
Government / E-rate procurementFLEX Matrix (TAA compliant)

10. KanexPro Solutions

AV over IP

Modular Matrix

  • FLEX Series: FLEX-MF8X10 through FLEX-MF24X60. Built-in video wall, quad view, per-output scaling, CEC, RS-232/TCP/IP/web GUI control. TAA compliant.

Conclusion

The right architecture depends on scale, network maturity, latency requirements, and anticipated growth. AV over IP is a proven, production-ready architecture for medium-to-large installations. The key shift for integrators is treating the network as part of the AV system. When designed correctly, AV over IP delivers a more scalable distribution infrastructure than a traditional matrix.

Contact KanexPro at support@kanexpro.com or 888.975.1368 for system design assistance.